For kinetic weapons like tanks, production costs generally outweigh research and development. For cyber weapons, R&D is almost everything.
Max Smeets’ take on the cost of cyber weapons is a thoughtful piece about the economics of cyber warfare, and the article is a useful point of departure on this topic. However, a few additional points not discussed by Smeets are worth considering, and they all point in the direction of higher costs that his piece might predict.
Begin with the fact that the economics for cyber weapons usable in a military context are fundamentally different than for kinetic weapons. With the latter, military power is highly correlated with number—specifically, the number of identical units of a given weapon. One hundred tanks (with crews, logistics, etc.) provides more military power than one tank. That is, for kinetic weapons, military power accrues as the result of procurement processes.
John J. Mearsheimer: The Return of Great-Power Politics
The Center for International Relations and Sustainable Development (CIRSD) has published a new Horizons Interviewwith Professor John J. Mearsheimer, one of the most influential political scientists of our time and the leading voice of structural realism in international relations. The interview was moderated by Vuk Jeremić, President of CIRSD and Editor-in-Chief of Horizons.
Read more
Economic Statecraft’s Impact on Geopolitical Realities
European Russophobia and Europe’s Rejection of Peace: A Two-Century Failure
Europe has repeatedly rejected peace with Russia at moments when a negotiated settlement was available, and those rejections have proven profoundly self-defeating.
Read more